Since the 1950s, scientists have been striving to create computers that can think like humans. And each year they pit their efforts against a panel of real humans. Brian Christian went head to hard drive...
It's early September and I wake up in a Brighton hotel, the sea crashing just outside. In a few hours, I will embark on what I have come here to do: have a series of five-minute-long instant-message exchanges with strangers. It may not sound like much, but the stakes for these quick chats are high. On the other side of the conversation will be a psychologist, a linguist, a broadcaster and a computer scientist. Together they will form a judging panel, evaluating my ability to do one of the strangest things I've been asked to do: convince them that I'm human.
Fortunately, I am human; unfortunately, it's not clear how much that will help.
I'm participating as a human "confederate": one of four representatives of homo sapiens in the artificial intelligence community's most anticipated annual event – a meeting to confer the Loebner prize on the winner of a competition called the Turing test. The test is named after mathematician Alan Turing, famed second world war code-breaker and one of the founders of computer science, who in 1950 attempted to answer one of the field's earliest questions: Can machines think?
Tags:
tech
Leave a comment